Disrupting The Video Market – How Cloud Based Digital Asset Management Is Changing Broadcasting

Europe’s largest broadcaster conference IBC 2017 ended last week with more questions than answers. We are only just scratching the surface of what is going to be a disruptive few years for TV and video production.

Tweet: How Cloud Based Digital Asset Management Is Changing Broadcasting => http://bit.ly/2k8nTJ2

IBC 2017

On arrival at IBC, the first impression that every visitor had is that Google has landed. Registration happens inside the front doors of Hall 14 – and immediately to the right of the registration Google had set up camp. This is worth noting because last year they were in the back corner of the hall where footfall was light and the years before that they were… well, they were there, you just couldn’t find them. They didn’t take a stand. No matter how much worked on your search engine optimisation, the only place they could be found was on the occasional stage talking about various versions of Android TV and Google TV before that.

The next thing that was noticeable was what one engineer I spoke to was called the “race into space”. The race is simply the realisation that the cloud is not the enemy and that in fact it can offer quite a few enhancements to broadcast television. The message from the floor: beware those who continue to ignore the inevitable hybrid model of on-premise and cloud deployment.

But the thing that got me the most was coming to terms with the complexity of it all. There is a lot of money in television – north of half a trillion dollars in ad revenue and subs every year – which means there is a lot of pie to be shared out. But if you stand back and think about it in very simple terms – IBC 2017 was a conference for 60,000 engineers whose job it is to get pictures from a camera on to a screen. Why is it so complicated? Seems like we are making things overly difficult for ourselves.

One of the things that strikes you when you delve into the world of broadcast is the endless acronyms and technologies that differentiate one thing from the next. What is frustrating is the inevitable overlap between technologies. As for the acronyms and semantics, confusion and distrust reign when “end to end” is used to describe almost every “asset management” platform.

Media Asset Management

Take for example the difference between a Media Asset Management platform and a Digital Asset Management platform or MAMs and DAMs. Historically, TV was all about MAMs because they dealt with moving media while non-moving media (like images and documents) were handled by DAMs.

But it is absurd to think that a DAM wouldn’t also be a MAM or vice versa. Or is it? Turns out there is very little knowledge about DAMs at IBC whereas half the conference is devoted to MAMs. In fact, if you were to look at Forrester’s list of the largest DAMs in the world – not a single one was represented at IBC. On the other hand, the world’s largest MAMs – Adobe and Avid – were two of the busiest brands at the event. I smell an opportunity.

So why should we care about MAM’s and DAMs? Because like with all things in our digital world, the fragmented broadcast ecosystem is going to have to start converging before we are left with a whole lot of technologies that simply don’t talk with each other.

5 Distruptors to the Digital Asset Management Ecosystem

Here is a list of 5 things that Forrester rightly pointed out in a paper earlier this year that are going to disrupt the DAM ecosystem. The interesting thing is that they are also disrupting the MAM ecosystem and the TV ecosystem:

1. Cloud deployment. The fact that we no longer have to buy tin boxes and store them in the basement means that we can manage video from anywhere.

2. Convergence with other digital experience solutions. Time for MAMs to start thinking like DAMs and vice versa.

3. Analytics capabilities to measure content performance. GroupM launches their Finecast platform next week which is supposed to do this for advertising. We will see how Nielsen and Comscore view it over time. Regardless of whether it succeeds and becomes a standard, the strategy is right.

4. Integration to support flexibility. Can you spell API? This is how the cloud exercises its might.

5. Machine learning to support metadata. Nothing like a few buzz words like machine learning and Artificial Intelligence to get 60,000 engineers excited and looking forward to next year.

All in all, broadcast is in a good place. The incumbents continue to reign supreme and change will be gradual. However, broadcasters need to start thinking more like the big digital platforms by leading the change if they really want to be the masters of their own destiny.

Latest Blog Posts

The Impact of the Creator Economy

In our last post, we looked at the rise of the Creator Economy. Now, let’s take a look at its impact.

This revolutionary phenomenon means that people who create content — from filmmakers to musicians — get funded directly by their audience. This has the disruptive impact of removing the traditional middlemen like record labels, film/TV commissioners, and publishers.

This has created amazing opportunities for content creators.

The Rise of the Creator Economy

There was a time when the phrase “Lights, Camera, Action” was only heard within the exclusive walls of Hollywood studios. Not so these days!

The past two decades have seen the rise of the Creator Economy…the lowering of technological barriers facilitates anyone to generate an income through delivering content to an audience.

Social media enables access to audiences without the need to go through a broadcaster or publisher.

But creators need access to technological tools to streamline the process of making fab content.

The Demand for Remote-Enabling Video Technology

Practically everyone owns a smartphone these days; therefore, we all carry a mini computer in our pockets. But, more than that, phones can record video clips and you can edit that footage through apps; so, effectively, we are all walking around with full video production capabilities.

So, armed with this portable video technology, it must be a piece of cake to make professional-looking videos, right?

Wrong!

Remote Work: The Evolution of Enterprise Video

Enterprise video has long been one of the key tools for small to medium-sized companies to fulfil their business objectives. But when the pandemic dispatched us to our homes to work remotely, suddenly it wasn’t so easy to create, collaborate on, and broadcasting video. Work had changed. Leveraging video for business was about to change too.

How Enterprises Are Creating Video More Easily

There’s no denying the domination of video with more than two billion monthly active users on YouTube and one billion on TikTok.

In our last post, we looked at trends in the acceleration of video management technology, which is driven by factors such as remote working, the ever-increasing demand for streaming content, and the rise of video content creators.

However, the ‘players’ — streamers, creators, and enterprises — have had to face the reality that the old way of working with video simply isn’t viable any more.

Get Started Now

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. To manage cookies, please refer to our Privacy Policy. Please note that you must "accept" the privacy policy to continue using this website. View the Privacy Policy

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close